酵母SUP4-o突变检测系统及铬遗传毒性分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-616x.2017.01.013

癌变·畸变·突变 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 65-69.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-616x.2017.01.013

酵母SUP4-o突变检测系统及铬遗传毒性分析

孟晓卿, 房志家, 魏红岩, 杨占菊, 黄志伟

东华大学化学化工与生物工程学院生态纺织教育部重点实验室, 上海 201620

收稿日期:2016-07-22 修回日期:2016-12-20 出版日期:2017-01-31 发布日期:2017-01-31
通讯作者: 黄志伟,E-mail:zhiweih@dhu.edu.cn E-mail:zhiweih@dhu.edu.cn
作者简介:孟晓卿,E-mail:1021253735@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（31100549）；生态纺织教育部重点实验室（东华大学/江南大学）资助课题

Genotoxicity investigation of tri- and hexavalent chromium using a yeast SUP4-o mutation assay

MENG Xiaoqing, FANG Zhijia, WEI Hongyan, YANG Zhanju, HUANG Zhiwei

Key Laboratory of Science & Technology of Eco-Textile, College of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China

Received:2016-07-22 Revised:2016-12-20 Online:2017-01-31 Published:2017-01-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的：应用酵母SUP4-o突变检测系统来评价两种价态铬（Cr³⁺，Cr⁶⁺）的遗传毒性。方法：用电转化法将YCpMP2质粒转入MKP-o（SJR576）得到SJR576-p菌株。用相同浓度（150 μmol/L）三氯化铬和重铬酸钾（Cr³⁺，Cr⁶⁺）分别处理酵母SJR576-p细胞24 h，取适量培养细胞均匀涂布刀豆氨酸抗性筛选平板和尿嘧啶缺陷合成培养基（SC-Ura），计数克隆数。结果：150 μmol/L三氯化铬和重铬酸钾处理导致SUP4-o正向突变频率分别为2.6×10^-5和2.3×10^-5，比对照提高约5倍，两种价态铬之间无显著性差异（P > 0.05）。结论：真核酵母SUP4-o突变检测系统对可疑遗传毒性化合物的分析具有多个可筛选的性状和遗传操作的简便性。三价铬也能够造成酵母细胞遗传物质的损伤，具有一定的遗传毒性。

关键词: 酵母, 遗传损伤, 突变, Cr³⁺, Cr⁶⁺

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate genotoxicities of chromium (tri- and hexavalent states) using a new yeast mutation SUP4-o assay system. METHODS: YCpMP2 plasmid was transferred into MKP-o (SJR576) to obtain SJR576-p strain by electroporation. After treatment of the yeast cell SJR576-p with the same concentrations of Cr³⁺ and Cr⁶⁺ for 24 h,the cells were coated on canavanine resistance screening plates in uracil synthetic medium (SC-Ura),and the number of clones were subsequently counted. RESULTS: Compared with the untreated controls,the mutation rates of the treated groups with potassium dichromate and chromium trichloride increased five times. The values were about 23 and 26 parts per million,respectively. While there was no significant difference between the groups treated with Cr³⁺ and Cr⁶⁺. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that Cr³⁺ can cause DNA damage and genotoxicity. Additionally,the yeast SUP4-o mutation assay system is useful for detecting genotoxicity.

Key words: yeast, genotoxicity, mutations, Cr³⁺, Cr⁶⁺

中图分类号:

Q319+.33

孟晓卿, 房志家, 魏红岩, 杨占菊, 黄志伟. 酵母SUP4-o突变检测系统及铬遗传毒性分析[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2017, 29(1): 65-69.

MENG Xiaoqing, FANG Zhijia, WEI Hongyan, YANG Zhanju, HUANG Zhiwei. Genotoxicity investigation of tri- and hexavalent chromium using a yeast SUP4-o mutation assay[J]. Carcinogenesis, Teratogenesis & Mutagenesis, 2017, 29(1): 65-69.

参考文献

[1] COX JA,FELLOWS MD,HASHIZUME T,et al. The utility of metabolic activation mixtures containing human hepatic post-mitochondrial supernatant (S9) for in vitro genetic toxicity assessment[J]. Mutagenesis,2016,31(2):117-130.

[2] REDDY A V B,JAAFAR J,UMAR K,et al. Identification, control strategies,and analytical approaches for the determination of potential genotoxic impurities in pharmaceuticals:A comprehensive review[J]. J Sep Sci,2015,38(5):764-779.

[3] DONG J,MA Q. Advances in mechanisms and signaling pathways of carbon nanotube toxicity[J]. Nanotoxicology, 2015,9(5):658-676.

[4] MORTELMANS K,ZEIGRE E. The Ames Salmonella/microsome mutagenicity assay[J]. Mutat Res,2000,455(1):29-60.

[5] 刘波,金建玲,张辉,等. Ames测试不确定性分析[J]. 应用与环境生物学报,2007,13(5):726-730.

[6] BISWAS P,HALDAR S,PAKHIRA M C,et al. Efficiency of nutrient utilization and reproductive performance of pre-pubertal anestrous dairy heifers supplemented with inorganic and organic chromium compounds[J]. J Sci Food Agric,2006,86(86):804-815.

[7] MUDRAK S V,WELZ-VOEGELE C,JINKS-ROBERTSON S. The polymerase eta translesion synthesis DNA polymerase acts independently of the mismatch repair system to limit mutagenesis caused by 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine in yeast[J]. Mol Cell Biochem,2009,29(19):5316-5326.

[8] GéLUGNE J P,BELLE J B. Modifiers of ochre suppressors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae that exhibit ochre suppressor-dependent amber suppression[J]. Curr Genet,1988,14(4):345-354.

[9] RYDéN S M,ISAKSSON L A. A temperature-sensitive mutant of Escherichia coli that shows enhanced misreading of UAG/A and increased efficiency for tRNA nonsense suppressors[J]. Mol Gen Genet,1984,193(1):38-45.

[10] PIERCE M K,GIROUX C N,KUNG B A. Development of a yeast system to assay mutational specificity[J]. Mutat Res, 1987, 182(2):65-74.

[11] ABDULOVIC A,KIM N,JINKS-ROBERTSON S. Mutagenesis and the three R's in yeast[J]. DNA Repair,2006,5(4):409-421.

[12] KUNZ B A,MIS J R. Mutational specificities of 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea and nitrogen mustard in the SUP4-o gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae[J]. Cancer Res,1989, 49(2):279-83.

[13] GIROUS C N,MIS J R,PIERCE M K,et al. DNA sequence analysis of spontaneous mutations in the SUP4-o gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae[J]. Mol Cell Biochem,1988,8(2):978-981.

[14] LANGRRD S. One hundred years of chromium and cancer:a review of epidemiological evidence and selected case reports[J]. Am J Ind Med,1990,17(2):189-214.

[15] HUA Y,CLARK S,REN J,et al. Molecular mechanisms of chromium in alleviating insulin resistance[J]. J Nutr Biochem, 2012,23(4):313-319.

[16] VINCENTJ B. Chromium:celebrating 50 years as an essential element?[J]. Dalton Trans,2010,39(16):3787-3794.

[17] KSHEMINSKA H,FEDOROVYCH D,BABYAK L,et al. Chromium (Ⅲ) and (VI) tolerance and bioaccumulation in yeast:a survey of cellular chromium content in selected strains of representative genera[J]. Process Biochem,2005,40(5):1565-1572.

[18] HUANG Z,KUANG X,CHEN Z,et al. Comparative studies of tri-and hexavalent chromium cytotoxicity and their effects on oxidative state of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells[J]. Curr Microbiol,2014,68(4):448-456.'

酵母SUP4-o突变检测系统及铬遗传毒性分析

Genotoxicity investigation of tri- and hexavalent chromium using a yeast SUP4-o mutation assay

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	葛宪民, 李彬, 黄超培, 高玉秋, 罗海兰, 杨慧, 王彦武, 温平镜, 蓝光华, 陈欢欢, 孟琴, 罗柳红, 邓月琴, 刘帅凤, 吴秀玲. 抗HIV药物齐夫多定、拉夫米定和克力芝联合用药的急性经口毒性和致突变作用[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2021, 33(6): 466-469,474.
[2]	李蕊瑞, 张立实, 陈锦瑶. 人群PIG-A基因突变测定的研究进展[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2021, 33(5): 396-400.
[3]	徐启璐, 高慧, 冉学红, 王军军, 张俊英, 刘丽萍. 两种异常核型髓系肿瘤的基因突变及临床相关性分析[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2021, 33(4): 296-301,306.
[4]	石海林, 何天基, 刘峰, 蔡孟会, 葛波. 基于TCGA数据库分析肿瘤突变负荷在肌层浸润性膀胱癌预后评估中的价值[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2020, 32(6): 430-437,443.
[5]	黄超培, 覃辉艳, 张陆娟, 王彦武, 何励, 傅伟忠. 黑果腺肋花楸提取物的急性毒性和致突变性研究[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2020, 32(6): 474-476.
[6]	张佳虹, 张庆英, 张燕虹, 陈甲连, 谢芳, 刘锐国, 吴容, 吴龙飞. 一个家族性高胆固醇血症家系的基因突变筛查与评估[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2020, 32(3): 229-232,245.
[7]	曹易懿, 刘维映, 尤馨悦, 奚晶, 陈瑞雪, 张新宇, 栾洋. 多溴联苯醚BDE-3、BDE-47和BDE-209的体外遗传毒性评价[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2020, 32(1): 15-20,28.
[8]	郑凯, 王冰玉, 徐新云, 耿红, 黄海燕, 刘威, 龙鼎新. 深圳和太原PM_2.5样品致突变作用研究[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2019, 31(6): 483-487.
[9]	陈高峰, 王亚楠, 王丹, 毛志慧, 黄芝瑛, 文海若, 王雪. Pig-a基因突变试验研究进展[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2019, 31(6): 492-497.
[10]	王亚楠, 文海若, 王雪. 遗传毒性基因突变评价方法的研究进展[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2019, 31(5): 406-411.
[11]	姚佳, 刘星, 卢光玉, 朱方渝, 吴倩倩, 李湘鸣. RNR3启动子调控的红绿荧光蛋白双信号发光酵母细胞对化学诱变原的筛选[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2019, 31(4): 276-282.
[12]	杨谨如, 秦露露, 朱勇飞. JAK2基因突变与慢性髓系白血病易感性的meta分析[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2019, 31(3): 231-237.
[13]	李若婉, 周长慧, 黄鹏程, 常艳. 基于TK6细胞的体外PIG-A基因突变检测方法的建立[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2019, 31(3): 242-248.
[14]	侯腾, 马璐, 张爱华. 组蛋白修饰在砷中毒发病机制中的研究进展[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2019, 31(2): 153-156.
[15]	张峰, 赵龙, 樊金萍, 吴雪伶, 孟淑芳. Q61R和V112A突变的HRAS基因在NIH小鼠体内诱发肿瘤的实验研究[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2019, 31(1): 1-8.