PM2.5对支气管上皮细胞DNA损伤作用研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-616x.2019.06.010

癌变·畸变·突变 ›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 469-473,497.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-616x.2019.06.010

PM_2.5对支气管上皮细胞DNA损伤作用研究

王冰玉^1,2, 郑凯^1,2, 徐新云², 谢红卫¹, 于军晖¹, 龙鼎新¹

1. 南华大学公共卫生学院, 湖南衡阳 421001;
2. 深圳市疾病预防控制中心环境与健康所, 广东深圳 518055

收稿日期:2019-03-21 修回日期:2019-10-21 出版日期:2019-11-30 发布日期:2019-12-04
通讯作者: 徐新云,E-mail:xyxu2008@163.com;谢红卫,E-mail:xiehw99@126.com E-mail:xyxu2008@163.com;xiehw99@126.com
作者简介:王冰玉,E-mail:609392531@qq.com。
基金资助:
深圳市科技研发基础研究学科布局项目（JCYJ201704131017 13324）

PM_2.5 on DNA damage in human bronchial epithelial cells

WANG Bingyu^1,2, ZHENG Kai^1,2, XU Xinyun², XIE Hongwei¹, YU Junhui¹, LONG Dingxin¹

1. School of Public Health, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, Hunan;
2. Institute of Environment and Health, Shenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China

Received:2019-03-21 Revised:2019-10-21 Online:2019-11-30 Published:2019-12-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：探讨大气细颗粒物（PM_2.5）染毒对人支气管上皮细胞（HBE） DNA损伤的作用。方法：分别用8、20、50 μg/mL的PM_2.5水溶液染毒HBE细胞24 h后，单细胞凝胶电泳实验（SCGE）检测DNA损伤情况。10和50 μg/L的PM_2.5水溶液染毒HBE细胞，以未染毒细胞作为阴性对照组，10 μmol/L的Cr⁶⁺水溶液为阳性对照组，实时荧光定量PCR （qPCR）检测DNA损伤修复基因hOGG1、hMTH1的mRNA表达水平的变化，Western blot检测hOGG1、hMTH1蛋白表达变化。结果：单细胞凝胶电泳检测8、20和50 μg/mL PM_2.5水溶液染毒组HBE细胞的尾部DNA含量、尾长、尾距较阴性对照组明显增加（P < 0.05或P < 0.01）。qPCR结果显示，与阴性对照组比较，HBE细胞hOGG1 mRNA表达水平在10和50 μg/mL PM_2.5水溶液染毒以及阳性对照Cr⁶⁺水溶液染毒后分别升高75.0%、132.0%、214.0%；hMTH1 mRNA分别升高61.0%、144.0%、75.0%。Western blot结果显示，与阴性对照组比较，HBE细胞hOGG1蛋白表达水平在10和50 μg/mL PM_2.5水溶液染毒以及Cr⁶⁺水溶液染毒后分别升高47.6%、64.0%、47.0%；hMTH1蛋白分别升高20.5%、49.8%、20.9%。结论：PM_2.5水溶液染毒对HBE细胞DNA具有明显的损伤作用，并引起HBE细胞DNA损伤修复基因hOGG1、hMTH1表达水平升高。

关键词: 大气细颗粒物, 人支气管上皮细胞, DNA损伤, 单细胞凝胶电泳实验

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of PM_2.5 on DNA damage in human bronchial epithelial cells (HBE). METHODS: HBE cells were exposed to PM_2.5 (0,8,20,50 μg/mL) for 24 h and DNA damage was detected using the single cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE) assay. For another investigation,cells were treated with 10 and 50 μg/mL,untreated cells were used as negative controland cells treated with 10 μmol/L Cr⁶⁺ were used as positive control. mRNA expressions of DNA damage repair genes,including hOGG1 and hMTH1,were detected using real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) and protein expressions using Western blot. RESULTS: SCGE data show that the tail DNA content,tail length,tail distance significantly increased in the treated groups compared with the control group (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). The qPCR data show that,compared with the control group,expression of hOGG1 mRNA increased by 75.0%,132.0%,214.0% after exposure to PM_2.5 at 10,50 μg/mL and positive control Cr⁶⁺,respectively. Expression of hMTH1 mRNA increased by 61.0%,144.0% and 75.0%,respectively. The Western blot data show that,compared with the control group,expression of hOGG1 protein increased by 47.6%,64.0%,47.0% after exposure to PM_2.5 at 10,50 μg/mL and positive control Cr⁶⁺,respectively. Expression of hMTH1 protein increased by 20.5%,49.8%,20.9%,respectively. CONCLUSION: Our investigation shows that PM_2.5 induced DNA strand breaks which caused dose-dependent increase of expression in DNA damage repair genes.

Key words: PM_2.5, human bronchial epithelial cells, DNA damage, single cell gel electrophoresis

中图分类号:

R122.7

王冰玉, 郑凯, 徐新云, 谢红卫, 于军晖, 龙鼎新. PM_2.5对支气管上皮细胞DNA损伤作用研究[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2019, 31(6): 469-473,497.

WANG Bingyu, ZHENG Kai, XU Xinyun, XIE Hongwei, YU Junhui, LONG Dingxin. PM_2.5 on DNA damage in human bronchial epithelial cells[J]. Carcinogenesis, Teratogenesis & Mutagenesis, 2019, 31(6): 469-473,497.

参考文献

[1] HASHEMINASSAB S, DAHER N, SCHAUER J J, et al. Source apportionment and organic compound characterization of ambient ultrafine particulate matter (PM) in the Los Angeles Basin[J]. Atmospheric Environ, 2013, 79:529-539.;
[2] KIM K H, KABIR E, KABIR S. A review on the human health impact of airborne particulate matter[J]. Environ Int, 2015, 74:136-143.;
[3] DU P R, DU R, REN W S, et al. Seasonal variation characteristic of inhalable microbial communities in PM_2.5 in Beijing city, China[J]. Sci Total Environ, 2018, 610/611:308-315.;
[4] KIM Y, SEO J, KIM J Y, et al. Characterization of PM_2.5 and identification of transported secondary and biomass burning contribution in Seoul, Korea[J]. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2018, 25(5):4330-4343.;
[5] BELL M L, DOMINICI F, EBISU K, et al. Spatial and temporal variation in PM(2.5) chemical composition in the United States for health effects studies[J]. Environ Health Perspect, 2007, 115(7):989-995.;
[6] 罗苹, 史廷明, 闻胜, 等. 武汉市大气细颗粒物(PM_2.5)中多环芳烃(PAHs)的含量与污染来源分析[J]. 公共卫生与预防医学, 2018, 29(6):25-28.;
[7] 梁春梅, 操基玉, 王勇, 等. 油烟中细颗粒物致胎鼠肺泡Ⅱ型上皮细胞DNA损伤的研究[J]. 环境与健康杂志, 2011, 28(10):850-853, 941.;
[8] GUALTIERI M, LONGHIN E, MATTIOLI M, et al. Gene expression profiling of A549 cells exposed to Milan PM_2.5[J]. Toxicol Lett, 2012, 209(2):136-145.;
[9] 阚海东, 陈仁杰. PM_2.5对人体危害有多大[J]. 中国经济报告, 2015(4):114-116.;
[10] CHEN C, ZHU P F, LAN L, et al. Short-term exposures to PM_2.5 and cause-specific mortality of cardiovascular health in China[J]. Environ Res, 2018, 161:188-194.;
[11] REN X, TANG Y, SUN J M, et al. Flavone protects HBE cells from DNA double-strand breaks caused by PM_2.5[J]. Hum Cell, 2018, 31(2):116-126.;
[12] 颜森波, 于国伟, 谌慧. PM_2.5对DNA的损伤作用概述[J]. 职业与健康, 2015, 31(6):847-850.;
[13] REDDEL R R, KE Y, GERWIN B I, et al. Transformation of human bronchial epithelial cells by infection with SV40 or adenovirus-12 SV40 hybrid virus, or transfection via strontium phosphate coprecipitation with a plasmid containing SV40 early region genes[J]. Cancer Res, 1988, 48(7):1904-1909.;
[14] KIM B S, PARK J J, EDLER L, et al. New measure of DNA repair in the single-cell gel electrophoresis (comet) assay[J]. Environ Mol Mutagen, 2002, 40(1):50-56.;
[15] SIPINEN V, LAUBENTHAL J, BAUMGARTNER A, et al. In vitro evaluation of baseline and induced DNA damage in human sperm exposed to benzo[a]pyrene or its metabolite benzo[a]pyrene-7, 8-diol-9, 10-epoxide, using the comet assay[J]. Mutagenesis, 2010, 25(4):417-425.

PM_2.5对支气管上皮细胞DNA损伤作用研究

PM_2.5 on DNA damage in human bronchial epithelial cells

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李柏茹, 秦双建, 关岚, 李闰冰, 蔡颖, 蒲桔宁, 曾明, 肖芳, 徐新云. PM_2.5对HK-2细胞氧化损伤和凋亡的影响[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2021, 33(5): 360-364.
[2]	刘洁仪, 张睿, 夏冬, 李镕, 李晓雯, 陈姿旭, 魏青, 赵志强, 何云. PM_2.5中不同组分对人脐静脉内皮细胞的联合毒性作用研究[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2021, 33(2): 116-123,128.
[3]	李柏茹, 秦双建, 李闰冰, 蔡颖, 郑凯, 曾明, 肖芳, 徐新云. p38MAPK基因对PM_2.5染毒HK-2细胞部分癌基因和凋亡相关基因表达的影响[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2021, 33(2): 129-135,142.
[4]	马顺鹏, 王全凯, 王苗, 宋佳阳, 乌瀚宝栎尔, 谢广云, 许建宁. 甲基丙烯酸环氧丙酯诱导16HBE细胞恶性转化过程中细胞凋亡相关lncRNA的筛选及功能研究[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2021, 33(1): 1-5,31.
[5]	李柏茹, 秦双建, 李闰冰, 蔡颖, 郑凯, 王冰玉, 曾明, 肖芳, 徐新云. PM_2.5对HK-2肾细胞部分癌基因和凋亡基因表达的影响[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2021, 33(1): 6-11.
[6]	蔡颖, 李闰冰, 郑凯, 秦双建, 李柏茹, 张朝晖, 徐新云. PM_2.5染毒HBE细胞前后差异表达的microRNAs及其生物信息学分析[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2020, 32(5): 355-362.
[7]	秦双建, 李柏茹, 蔡颖, 郑凯, 王冰玉, 李闰冰, 肖芳, 曾明, 徐新云. PM_2.5对L02肝细胞部分癌基因和凋亡相关基因表达的影响[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2020, 32(4): 281-285.
[8]	蔡颖, 郑凯, 秦双建, 李柏茹, 余淑苑, 刘宁, 季佳佳, 张朝晖, 徐新云. 沉默c-fos基因对PM_2.5染毒人支气管上皮细胞癌基因和凋亡相关基因表达的影响[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2020, 32(4): 298-303,308.
[9]	周长慧, 韩天娇, 黄鹏程, 马璟, 常艳. 大鼠多器官彗星试验方法的验证研究[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2020, 32(3): 233-237.
[10]	李琼, 陈燊, 张海燕, 吴小嫩, 李道传, 陈雯. 利用Tox21通路数据库评估石家庄市大气细颗粒物中多环芳烃激活毒性通路的风险[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2020, 32(2): 112-117.
[11]	师盼, 林重华, 舒易方, 瞿家权, 宋淑亮. 柠檬酸转运体SLC25A1对食管鳞癌细胞体外放射敏感性的影响及其分子机制[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2020, 32(2): 132-138.
[12]	王冰玉, 蔡颖, 郑凯, 谢红卫, 徐新云. PM_2.5对HBE细胞致癌致突变相关基因表达的影响[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2020, 32(1): 33-38,42.
[13]	谢广云, 郭浩然, 王全凯, 马顺鹏, 宋佳阳, 乌瀚宝栎尔, 许建宁. GMA诱导16HBE细胞恶性转化过程中LINC00472的表达及其意义[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2019, 31(6): 449-453.
[14]	郑凯, 王冰玉, 徐新云, 耿红, 黄海燕, 刘威, 龙鼎新. 深圳和太原PM_2.5样品致突变作用研究[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2019, 31(6): 483-487.
[15]	徐贤荣, 杨军. 旁斑蛋白组成成分1的结构与生物学功能研究进展[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2019, 31(6): 488-491.

PM2.5对支气管上皮细胞DNA损伤作用研究

PM2.5 on DNA damage in human bronchial epithelial cells

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

PM_2.5对支气管上皮细胞DNA损伤作用研究

PM_2.5 on DNA damage in human bronchial epithelial cells