年龄和性别对正常人外周血淋巴细胞核质桥自发率的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-616x.2021.01.010

癌变·畸变·突变 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 48-52.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-616x.2021.01.010

年龄和性别对正常人外周血淋巴细胞核质桥自发率的影响

赵骅, 陆雪, 蔡恬静, 田梅, 刘青杰

中国疾病预防控制中心辐射防护与核安全医学所, 辐射防护与核应急中国疾病预防控制中心重点实验室, 北京 100088

收稿日期:2020-08-12 修回日期:2020-10-19 出版日期:2021-01-30 发布日期:2021-02-06
通讯作者: 刘青杰,E-mail:liuqingjie@nirp.chinacdc.cn E-mail:liuqingjie@nirp.chinacdc.cn
作者简介:赵骅,E-mail:zhaohua@nirp.chinacdc.cn。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（81573081）

Effects of age and gender on formation of nucleoplasmic bridges in peripheral blood lymphocytes

ZHAO Hua, LU Xue, CAI Tianjing, TIAN Mei, LIU Qingjie

National Institute for Radiological Protection, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, China CDC Key Laboratory of Radiological Protection and Nuclear Emergency, Beijing 100088, China

Received:2020-08-12 Revised:2020-10-19 Online:2021-01-30 Published:2021-02-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的： 探索年龄、性别因素对我国健康人群外周血淋巴细胞核质桥自发率的影响，为核质桥的影响因素研究提供科学依据。方法： 选取98例健康成人，其中男性52例，女性46例，年龄范围为20~68岁，平均年龄为（40.7±12.6）岁。按年龄分为20~29岁组（22人）、30~39岁组（23人）、40~49岁组（25人）和50岁以上组（28人）。抽取研究对象外周血2 mL，采用胞质分裂阻滞法培养细胞40 h后，加入松胞素B （终浓度为10 μg/mL），继续培养至68 h收获细胞。每个受试者观察1 000个双核细胞，分析核质桥、微核及核芽的数量。结果： 核质桥总体自发率为每个细胞0.56‰，男性略高于女性，但差异无统计学意义（P > 0.05）。男性在不同年龄组间，核质桥自发率差异无统计学意义（P > 0.05）。女性40~49岁年龄组核质桥自发率最高，显著高于20~29岁组（U=2.31，P < 0.05）。微核自发率女性高于男性（U=4.40，P < 0.05），男性和女性受试者40~49岁组微核自发率均为最高。核芽自发率在不同性别间的差异无统计学意义（P > 0.05），在不同年龄组间无明显变化规律。结论： 健康人群中的核质桥自发率较低，不受性别因素影响，在20~49岁范围内具有随年龄增加而升高的趋势。

关键词: 核质桥, 微核, 核芽, 自发率, 年龄, 性别

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate influence of age and gender on spontaneous formation of nucleoplasmic bridges (NPB) in peripheral blood lymphocyte from in healthy Chinese subjects. METHODS: A total of 98 healthy adults (52 male and 46 female) aged 2068 years (40.7 ±12.6 years) were enrolled. The subjects were divided into different age groups:20-29 (22 subjects), 30-39 (23 subjects), 40-49 (25 subjects) and over 50 (28 subjects). At 40 h of their lymphocyte cultures in the cytokinesis-block cytome assay, cytochalasin-B (10 μg/mL) was added and cultures were harvested at 68 h. The presence of NPB, micronucleus (MN) and nuclear bud (NBD) in their peripheral blood lymphocytes were determined by analyzing 1 000 binucleated cells in each sample. RESULTS: The overall NPB spontaneous rate was 0.56‰, but the rates were non-significantly higher in males than in females. In addition, there was no statistically significant difference in male subjects among different age groups. However, the highest NPB spontaneous rate in females was found in 40-49 age group which was significantly higher than that in the 20-29 age group (U=2.31, P < 0.05). The MN spontaneous rates in females were higher than that in males (U=4.40, P < 0.05) and the highest rates in both male and female subjects were found in the 40-49 age groups. There was no statistical difference of NBD spontaneous rates between genders and among different age groups. CONCLUSION: NPB spontaneous rate in healthy population was very low which was not affected by gender but had increased trend within the 40-49 age group.

Key words: nucleoplasmic bridge, micronucleus, nuclear bud, spontaneous rate, age, gender

中图分类号:

R394.6

赵骅, 陆雪, 蔡恬静, 田梅, 刘青杰. 年龄和性别对正常人外周血淋巴细胞核质桥自发率的影响[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2021, 33(1): 48-52.

ZHAO Hua, LU Xue, CAI Tianjing, TIAN Mei, LIU Qingjie. Effects of age and gender on formation of nucleoplasmic bridges in peripheral blood lymphocytes[J]. Carcinogenesis, Teratogenesis & Mutagenesis, 2021, 33(1): 48-52.

参考文献

[1] FENECH M, MORLEY A A. Measurement of micronuclei in lymphocytes[J]. Mutat Res, 1985, 147(1/2):29-36.
[2] NAIRY R K, BHAT N N, SANJEEV G, et al. Dose-response study using micronucleus cytome assay:a tool for biodosimetry application[J]. Radiat Prot Dosim, 2017, 174(1):79-87.
[3] CARADONNA F. Nucleoplasmic bridges and acrocentric chromosome associations as early markers of exposure to low levels of ionising radiation in occupationally exposed hospital workers[J]. Mutagenesis, 2015, 30(2):269-275.
[4] FENECH M. Cytokinesis-block micronucleus cytome assay[J]. Nat Protoc, 2007, 2(5):1084-1104.
[5] TIAN X L, ZHAO H, CAI T J, et al. Dose-effect relationships of nucleoplasmic bridges and complex nuclear anomalies in human peripheral lymphocytes exposed to 60Co γ-rays at a relatively low dose[J]. Mutagenesis, 2016, 31(4):425-431.
[6] ZHAO H, LU X, LI S, et al. Characteristics of nucleoplasmic bridges induced by 60Co γ-rays in human peripheral blood lymphocytes[J]. Mutagenesis, 2014, 29(1):49-54.
[7] Nairy R K, Bhat N N, Sanjeev G, et al. Dose-response study using micronucleus cytome assay:a tool for biodosimetry application[J]. Radiat Prot Dosimetry, 2017, 174(1):79-87.
[8] NARJES Z, ERIC L, BRUNO C, et al. A new tool for genotoxic risk assessment:Reevaluation of the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay using semi-automated scoring following telomere and centromere staining[J]. Mutat Res, 2020, 850851:503143.
[9] RODRIGUES M A, BEATON-GREEN L A, WILKINS R C, et al. The potential for complete automated scoring of the cytokinesis block micronucleus cytome assay using imaging flow cytometry[J]. Mutat Res, 2018, 836(A):53-64.
[10] ZIJNO A, SAINI F, CREBELLI R. Suitability of cryopreserved isolated lymphocytes for the analysis of micronuclei with the cytokinesisblock method[J]. Mutagenesis, 2007, 22(5):311315.
[11] LOPE V, POLLÁN M, FERNÁNDEZ M, et al. Cytogenetic status in newborns and their parents in Madrid:the BioMadrid study[J]. Environ Mol Mutagen, 2010, 51(4):267-277.
[12] CHO N Y, KIM K W, KIM K K. Genomic health status assessed by a cytokinesis-block micronucleus cytome assay in a healthy middle-aged Korean population[J]. Mutat Res, 2017, 814:7-13.
[13] DONMEZ-ALTUNTAS H, BITGEN N. Evaluation of the genotoxicity and cytotoxicity in the general population in Turkey by use of the cytokinesisblock micronucleus cytome assay[J]. Mutat Res, 2012, 748(1/2):1-7.
[14] NEFIC H, HANDZIC I. The effect of age, sex, and lifestyle factors on micronucleus frequency in peripheral blood lymphocytes of the Bosnian population[J]. Mutat Res, 2013, 753(1):1-11.
[15] GARAJ-VRHOVAC V, DURINEC M, KOPJAR N, et al. A survey on the cytogenetic status of the Croatian general population by use of the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay[J]. Mutat Res, 2008, 649(1-2):91-100.
[16] LI Y, SHIRLEY B C, WILKINS R C, et al. Radiation dose estimation by completely automated interpretation of the dicentric chromosome assay[J]. Radiat Prot Dosim, 2019, 186(1):42-47.
[17] MENDES M E, MENDONCA J C G, BARQUINERO J F, et al. Comparative study of micronucleus assays and dicentric plus ring chromosomes for dose assessment in particular cases of partial-body exposure[J]. Int J Radiat Biol, 2019, 95(8):10581071.
[18] MEENAKSHI C, VENKATRAMAN B. Correlation between cytogenetic biomarkers obtained from DC and CBMN assays caused by low dose radon exposure in smokers[J]. Int J Radiat Biol, 2019, 95(9):1268-1275.
[19] COSKUN M, COSKUN M, CAYIR A, et al. Frequencies of micronuclei (MNi), nucleoplasmic bridges (NPBs), and nuclear buds (NBUDs) in farmers exposed to pesticides in Çanakkale, Turkey[J]. Environ Int, 2011, 37(1):93-96.
[20] VRAL A, FENECH M, THIERENS H. The micronucleus assay as a biological dosimeter of in vivo ionising radiation exposure[J]. Mutagenesis, 2011, 26(1):11-17.
[21] GAJSKI G, GERIC M, ORESCANIN V, et al. Cytokinesisblock micronucleus cytome assay parameters in peripheral blood lymphocytes of the general population:Contribution of age, sex, seasonal variations and lifestyle factors[J]. Ecotox Environ Safe, 2018, 148:561-570.
[22] MEENAKSHI C, SIVASUBRAMANIAN K, VENKATRAMAN B. Nucleoplasmic bridges as a biomarker of DNA damage exposed to radon[J]. Mutat Res, 2017, 814:22-28.
[23] MATEUCA R, LOMBAERT N, AKA P V, et al. Chromosomal changes:induction, detection methods and applicability in human biomonitoring[J]. Biochimie, 2006, 88(11):1515-1531.
[24] WOJDA A, ZIETKIEWICZ E, WITT M. Effects of age and gender on micronucleus and chromosome nondisjunction frequencies in centenarians and younger subjects[J]. Mutagenesis, 2007, 22(3):195-200.

年龄和性别对正常人外周血淋巴细胞核质桥自发率的影响

Effects of age and gender on formation of nucleoplasmic bridges in peripheral blood lymphocytes

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	蔡绮, 高德煜, 史建峰, 于浩, 韩妍, 杨柳, 赵蕾, 王召旭. 以树鼩为微核试验新型动物模型的初步研究[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2021, 33(5): 370-374,382.
[2]	陆雪, 田雪蕾, 赵骅, 蔡恬静, 田梅, 刘青杰. 人外周血淋巴细胞微核分析用于估算离体模拟局部照射剂量的研究[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2021, 33(3): 193-196.
[3]	曹易懿, 刘维映, 尤馨悦, 奚晶, 陈瑞雪, 张新宇, 栾洋. 多溴联苯醚BDE-3、BDE-47和BDE-209的体外遗传毒性评价[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2020, 32(1): 15-20,28.
[4]	李爽, 陆雪, 封江彬, 田梅, 蔡恬静, 刘青杰. 性别和年龄对⁶⁰Co γ射线照射离体人外周血辐射敏感基因mRNA表达的影响[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2019, 31(6): 421-427.
[5]	王全凯, 谢广云, 马顺鹏, 郭浩然, 乌瀚宝栎尔, 宋佳阳, 许建宁. 甲基丙烯酸环氧丙酯的遗传毒性评价[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2019, 31(6): 479-482.
[6]	唐娇, 杨颖, 李庆, 赵敏, 杨杏芬. 利用中国仓鼠肺细胞体外微核试验评价三七提取液的遗传毒性[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2019, 31(5): 397-400.
[7]	李莹, 陈霞明, 李函融, 罗特. 3种市售蚊香液对植物根尖细胞的遗传损伤效应[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2019, 31(5): 401-405,411.
[8]	文海若, 郭雅娟, 黄芝瑛, 王雪, 淡墨. 不同表面修饰的氧化铁纳米颗粒对A549细胞的毒性及DNA损伤[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2018, 30(6): 413-421.
[9]	文海若, 邵安良, 陈亮, 淡墨, 胡燕平, 王雪, 徐丽明. 适合纳米材料遗传毒性评价方法的选择[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2018, 30(4): 326-331.
[10]	夏莹, 付少华, 张寅静, 王薇. 农药哌虫啶的遗传毒性试验[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2018, 30(2): 136-139.
[11]	曹易懿, 奚晶, 唐伟锋, 尤馨悦, 刘维映, 栾洋. 三氯生的体外遗传毒性评价[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2018, 30(1): 71-75.
[12]	王治, 凌曦, 张国伟, 高建芳, 邹鹏, 井澈, 林哲韬, 刘晋祎, 曹佳, 敖琳. 叶酸对1,3-丁二烯诱发的小鼠DNA低甲基化和染色体损伤的影响[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2017, 29(3): 189-193.
[13]	王超, 阮鸿洁, 豆捷雄, 段链, 张宏伟. 采用蚕豆根尖微核试验检测自来水厂水体的遗传毒性[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2016, 28(6): 481-483,490.
[14]	王超, 段链, 张宏伟. 汞、砷、甲醛单一及复合污染对蚕豆根尖细胞微核的影响及污染评价[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2016, 28(5): 383-387.
[15]	韩天娇, 周长慧, 常艳. 体内碱性彗星试验与微核试验联合测定甲磺酸乙酯遗传毒性方法的建立[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2016, 28(4): 277-280.