癌变·畸变·突变 ›› 2010, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (5): 346-351.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-616x.2010.05.005

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

A549和MDCK细胞外源性表达人APOBEC_3F和APOBEC_3G对流感病毒复制和突变的影响

王革非1/彭 程2/曾祥兴1/张 驰1/李康生1   

  1. 1. 汕头大学医学院微生物学与免疫学教研室, 广东高校免疫病理重点实验, 广东 汕头 515041; 2. 华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院感染科, 湖北 武汉 430030
  • 收稿日期:2010-03-22 修回日期:2010-07-12 出版日期:2010-09-30 发布日期:2010-09-30
  • 通讯作者: 李康生

Effects of human APOBEC_3F and APOBEC_3G on the replication and mutation of

WANG Ge-fei1, PENG Cheng2, ZENG Xiang-xing1, ZHANG Chi1, LI Kang-sheng1   

  1. 1.Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The Key Immunopathology Laboratory of Guangdong Province, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041; 2. Department of Infectious Diseases, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
  • Received:2010-03-22 Revised:2010-07-12 Online:2010-09-30 Published:2010-09-30
  • Contact: LI Kang-sheng

摘要: 目的: 研究人载脂蛋白B mRNA编辑酶催化多肽_3F(human apolipoprotein B mRNA_editing enzyme catalytic_polypeptide 3F,hA3F)和hA3G对流感病毒的复制和突变的影响。 方法: 外源性hA3F和hA3G通过脂质体转染至A549和MDCK细胞中,经Western blotting和间接免疫荧光鉴定后,用流感病毒进行感染,通过检测半数组织培养感染剂量(50% tissue culture infective dose, TCID50)和空斑实验确定病毒滴度;使用不同初始感染剂量,绘制动态的病毒生长曲线,以确认hA3F和hA3G对流感病毒复制的影响。Western blotting检测流感病毒感染后转染细胞表达外源性hA3F和hA3G的情况。病毒在转染细胞和对照细胞中连续传代,RT_PCR和测序分析其血凝素HA基因的突变频率。 结果: TCID50检测和空斑实验结果表明在hA3F和hA3G表达细胞中,流感病毒的滴度与对照细胞间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);病毒生长曲线表明,不同初始感染剂量、不同感染时相,转染hA3F和hA3G的细胞对人流感病毒的抑制作用与对照细胞间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。Western blotting结果表明感染后48 h仍能够在MDCK细胞中检测到hA3F和hA3G的重组蛋白。病毒HA片段的测序分析表明,转染hA3F和hA3G的细胞对流感病毒基因组的致突变频率与对照细胞间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论: 本研究表明hA3F和hA3G这两个重要的APOBEC成员,对人流感病毒的复制效率及突变频率无明显作用。

关键词: APOBEC_3F, APOBEC_3G, 流感病毒, 复制, 突变, A549

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of human apolipoprotein B mRNA_editing enzyme catalytic_polypeptide (APOBEC)_3F (hA3F) and _3G (hA3G) on the replication and mutation of influenza viruses. METHODS: A549 and MDCK were transfected using hA3F and hA3G plasmids, and the expression of recombinant proteins was detected using Western blotting and immunofluorescence assay. The titers of influenza virus, which replicated on the hA3F and hA3G expressing and control cells, were measured using TCID50 and plaque assay. The viral growth curves were drawn. The expression levels of hA3F and hA3G in influenza infected cells were detected using Western blotting. The mutation frequency of influenza viruses was detected using RT_PCR and DNA sequencing. RESULTS: The viral titers and viral growth curves indicated that there were no significant differences in replication of influenza virus between APOBEC proteins expressing cells and the control cells. Western blotting indicated that hA3F and hA3G were both over_expressed during the infection of influenza viral. DNA sequencing showed that there was no hypermutation in influenza viral genome induced by hA3F or hA3G. CONCLUSION: hA3F and hA3G have no obvious effects on the replication and mutation of influenza virus in A549 and MDCK cells.

Key words: hA_3F, hA_3G, influenza virus, replication, mutation, A549